Does it seem to anyone else like climate change scientist are just sitting in a room using a magic 8 ball to predict the earths future? (assuming you don't think they are politically motivated)
Their science is about that accurate. Here's the latest example:
They estimated ice melt in the Himalayas 2 years ago. They just got the actual results published yesterday.
They overestimated the ice loss by 1250%
Not 12%, not 100%, 1250%.
My point isn't that we shouldn't work to reduce pollution, my point is that climate change science is crap.
(I didn't link to the Fox News article because I figured it's better to read the original research rather than someone else's interpretation)
